Legislature(1997 - 1998)
1997-03-06 House Journal
Full Journal pdf1997-03-06 House Journal Page 0564 SB 56 The following, which had been held on reconsideration until today's calendar (page 549), was again before the House in third reading: SENATE BILL NO. 56 An Act relating to tourist oriented directional signs that are 90 inches in width and 18 inches in height, relating to penalties for violations related to outdoor advertising, and annulling a regulation of the Department of Transportation and Public Facilities. 1997-03-06 House Journal Page 0565 SB 56 Representative Mulder moved and asked unanimous consent that SB56 be returned to second reading for the specific purpose of considering Amendment No. 10. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Amendment No. 10 was offered by Representatives Mulder and Davies: Page 3, line 17, following "arrow.": Insert "The department may except a sign from the width and height requirements of this subsection if the sign does not exceed 90 inches in width or 18 inches in height and the department finds that the exception is consistent with the purposes of this subsection." Representative Mulder moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 10 be adopted. Objection was heard. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 10 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: SB 56--RECONSIDERATION Second Reading Amendment No. 10 YEAS: 35 NAYS: 2 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Austerman, Barnes, Berkowitz, Brice, Bunde, Cowdery, Croft, Davies, Davis, Elton, Foster, Green, Grussendorf, Hanley, Hodgins, Hudson, Ivan, James, Joule, Kelly, Kemplen, Kookesh, Kubina, Martin, Masek, Moses, Mulder, Nicholia, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Ryan, Sanders, Therriault, Williams Nays: Kohring, Ogan Excused: Dyson Absent: Kott, Vezey And so, Amendment No. 10 was adopted. 1997-03-06 House Journal Page 0566 SB 56 The following members moved and asked unanimous consent that they be allowed to abstain from voting due to a conflict of interest: Representative Masek Representative James Objection was heard, and the members were required to vote. The question to be reconsidered: Shall SB 56 am H pass the House? The roll was taken with the following result: SB 56 am H--RECONSIDERATION Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 28 NAYS: 11 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Austerman, Barnes, Brice, Bunde, Cowdery, Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Hodgins, Hudson, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Masek, Mulder, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Ryan, Sanders, Therriault, Vezey, Williams Nays: Berkowitz, Croft, Davies, Elton, Grussendorf, Joule, Kemplen, Kookesh, Kubina, Moses, Nicholia Excused: Dyson And so, SB 56 am H passed the House on reconsideration and was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.